In most often denied UDRPs dismissed the case without more, but from time to time are often denied with the tagline WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
It is a generally accepted rule that you can not submit the same claim twice for the same domain unless new significant facts from the case could not be described in the previous claim.
This was the decision in the case Umpqua Investments, Inc. v. Private Registrations Aktien Gesellschaft for dominance strandatkinson.com .
The plaintiff claimed to have the mark STRAND ATKINSON no evidence yet to have it officially recorded anywhere. As evidence of having rights prior to registration of the domain has filed paperwork with the registry of the company and a picture of his official website. Insufficient to prove that the terms STRAND ATKINSON have acquired a secondary meaning.
In the case FA0907001275289 led by the same panelist (James A. Carmody) adopted the same decision this time because the plaintiff did not submit sufficient evidence to prove bad faith in using the domain name by the defendant.
