The Domain Industry News » April 21, 2010

Feeds

12875 items (11617 unread) in 34 feeds

DotSauce Magazine (186 unread)
Domain Bits (2 unread)
ccTLD News (25 unread)
Daily Domainer (5 unread)
Domain Magnate (43 unread)
Digital Branding Blog (15 unread)
DomainTools Blog (64 unread)
Infrablog (12 unread)
Domain Name Wire (2072 unread)
Brand Protection Blog (78 unread)
Domain Smalltalk (48 unread)
DomainNews (3467 unread)
Domain Graduate
Domain Name Journal (480 unread)
I Squatted Your EU (106 unread)
Black Hat Domainer (10 unread)
Domainers Magazine (200 unread)
IGP Blog (152 unread)
ICANN blog (161 unread)
Stephane Van Gelder (78 unread)
Domain Name News (380 unread)
ICANN Announcements (417 unread)
WhoisIreland Review (3 unread)
ICANNWatch: Articles (4 unread)
WIPO Press Releases (77 unread)
SUCCESSCLICK.COM (44 unread)
Elliot's Blog (1344 unread)
OzDomainer.com (101 unread)
The Official Name.com Blog (264 unread)
ChefPatrick.com (77 unread)
CircleID (1461 unread)
Domainmonster.com (40 unread)
Domisfera (113 unread)
ResellerClub Blog (88 unread)

« Expand/Collapse

(20 unread)

April 22, 2010
0:12
IDN ccTLD Request from Jordan Successfully Passes String Evaluation
» ‎ ICANN Announcements

21 April 2010

April 21, 2010
23:44
$4 Million Spent Lobbying Congress on Domain Names
» ‎ Domain Name Wire
Companies spend $4 million influencing Capitol Hill.

Domain name companies and other companies with an interest in domain name matters spent about $4 million dollars lobbying Congress last year.

Using public records filed under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, Domain Name Wire has tallied total spending for 2009 by a number of companies. (See spending in the first half of 2009 here.)

VeriSign led the pack, spending $2.4 million to influence matters related to Domain name addressing, internet taxation, phishing and email legislation. In second place was Go Daddy, which spent $715,500 on a number of matters. In the second half of the year it focused on targeted online advertising and deep packet inspection.

With ICANN working to gain further independence from the U.S. government, the non-profit spent $240,000. It describes some of its interests as new gTLDs, “independence from UN/ITU/government capture”, and “post-JPA cooperation with USG”.

Neustar spent $140,000 on matters including those related to ICANN. Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse spent $130,000 compared to the $10,000 spent by Internet Commerce Association.

Both Demand Media and its eNom spent money on lobbying, totalling $170,000 between the two. eNom spent its portion on “Providing information to Congress regarding generic top level domain names.”

Banks.com spent $30,000, including on issues of “Treasury Department Symbols”. This should come as no surprise, since the company is fighting to hold onto its IRS.com domain name.

Some non-domain name companies spent money lobbying about domain name issues as well. Christian Coalition of America lobbied to try to stop the .xxx top level domain name. Both Xerox and Time Warner pushed issues related to internet domain names and trademarks.

© DomainNameWire.com 2009.
Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Related posts:

22:42
Take That Down Right Now - and Give Me That Too
» ‎ CircleID

Google has released a government requests tool. It's highly illuminating and may end up being quite disruptive. That's what surprising data visualizations can do for us.

Google receives thousands of requests from governments around the world to provide user data, mostly relating to criminal cases. It also receives many government requests to take material down from search results, ads, YouTube (non-copyright requests, because those would be coming from private parties), Blogger, etc. Google didn't include child pornography take-downs in these numbers, because it does that on its own.

The tool allows us to see the number of requests from different countries that Google received during the last six months of 2009. More than 3600 data requests from Brazil during those six months and more than 3500 from the US. But just 40 or so from Canada and 30 from Israel.

Germany asked for removal of material more than 180 times in six months—mostly having to do with court orders related to defamation claims, according to Google. If you click on the country's results, you'll see what percentage of removal claims Google complied with during those six months. For Germany, it's pretty high—94% taken down. Germany also made more than 450 data requests.

At the moment, the data is pretty coarse-grained. We don't know how many data requests Google complied with. We don't know what the triggers were, precisely, for any of these requests. We don't know anything about China. (Why? Google says, essentially, "It's complicated": "As noted in the map, Chinese officials consider censorship demands as state secrets, so we cannot disclose that information at this time. During the period that Google's joint venture operated google.cn, its search results were subject to censorship pursuant to demands from government agencies responsible for Internet regulation.")

But the numbers are surprisingly high. Thousands upon thousands of requests for data about users?

Perhaps other companies will follow suit. That would be extremely helpful. It's hard to know how meaningful the Google data is without any comparables.
Written by Susan Crawford, Professor, University of Michigan Law School
Follow CircleID on Twitter
More under: Data Center, Internet Governance, Privacy, Web
22:24
More on Portable Email Addresses
» ‎ CircleID

Last month a bill in the Israeli Knesset would have required ISPs to provide portable e-mail addresses, analogous to portable phone numbers that one can take from one phone company to the other. As I noted at the time (also cross-posted and discussed here on CircleID), e-mail works differently from telephone calls, and portability would be difficult, expensive, and unreliable. So I was wondering, idly, if we really wanted to provide portable e-mail addresses, how hard would it be?

Telephone number portability works by looking up the number in a global shared database before routing each call. The Internet has a global shared database in the DNS, and each time a mail message is sent, the sending system looks up each recipient address in the DNS to see how to route it. But the lookups are just for the domain name, the part after the @ sign, not for the whole address.

If we could adjust the syntax of mail addresses so both the user part and the domain got a DNS lookup, then it would be technically straightforward to port an address from one provider to another. I realized that some mail systems have done this all along. If someone's mail address were bob@example.com we can put the user name into the domain, and make the address something@bob.example.com, where the something is arbitrary. I've offered this option to my users for years, as a way to do tagged addresses, with the new form of the address equivalent to bob-something@example.com at delivery time, something that turns out to take one line of code to implement in the mail system I use.

Several ISPs offer user mail addresses in this form. Panix in New York and Demon Internet in London have done so since the early 1990s, and there are probably others I haven't run into. All of them do this to provide multiple addresses for their users, but with some degree (well, a large degree) of adminsitrative effort, they could arrange their DNS so that specific users' mail is delivered to other mail systems.

If you know in advance that you want to keep your mail address when you switch ISPs, you can register your own domain for $10 - $15/yr, but for people who aren't that adventurous, mail addresses with the user name after the @ sign offer, in principle, portable addresses too.
Written by John Levine, Author, Consultant & Speaker
Follow CircleID on Twitter
More under: DNS, Email

21:25
Scottsdale.com’s “City in The Box” Platform Part of Major Development/Marketing Deal
» ‎ Elliot's Blog
I’ve known about these plans for several weeks, and I am happy to share the press release from Fred Mercaldo and his team at Scottsdale.com, who have been working hard to make this a reality. This puts Fred and his company at the forefront of the geodomain industry, as they will have more pure city .com domain names under their management than just about any other company.

My company’s Burbank.com will be one of the first websites released under this marketing and development deal, and I am excited to be a part of it. I am confident Fred and his team will be able to drive considerably more revenue with Burbank.com.

Fred will be speaking at the Geodomain Expo in New Orleans at the end of the month, and he will be available to answer any questions city .com domain owners may have.

======

GeoDomain Development Ventures, LLC announces development of over 40 Pure City.com Sites in Major Development/Marketing Deal

Scottsdale.com’s “City In The Box” Software to power sites; CitiesPlanet.com formed to Manage Advertising and Marketing Duties.

Scottsdale, AZ — April 21, 2010 — Fred Mercaldo, Managing Partner of Scottsdale.com, LLC and newly formed GeoDomain Development Ventures, LLC announced today a major software development and marketing deal that includes over 40 City.com sites. “Our proven software platform (www.CityInTheBox.com) will power the sites; once they are launched, CitiesPlanet will perform all marketing and advertising functions, and will procure local partnerships and contracts that will monetize the sites. We look forward to a successful launch, and our goal is to grow to 150 pure City.com properties under management within 24 months”

Based in Scottsdale, CitiesPlanet (www.CitiesPlanet.com) has worked with numerous creative technology and digital marketing specialists to develop a marketing platform that will successfully reach out to local business in each City.com area. Combined with a robust CRM system, each business will receive a custom media kit with their specific company featured, giving business owners numerous advertising and partnering options with their local, official City.com branded site. “Our success rate so far has been 15% to 30% response rate, depending on which Directory category is being marketed, which is incredible”, says Mercaldo. “In addition, our system features a “nurture” campaign in the event a business has not responded to our first offer, and will automatically continue to send the opportunity to the business owner 3 additional times”.

The majority of the initial City.com sites are owned by State Ventures, LLC. “Fred Mercaldo has the vision to foresee the future of local Internet advertising and the marketing talent to accelerate the shift of local advertising to city portals,” says Nat Cohen, President of State Ventures, LLC. “Fred is one of the stand-up guys in the Geo Domain industry. We are very pleased to be partnering with Fred in helping him realize this vision for the industry.”

The City.com properties included in the initial launch feature a very diverse group of demographics and economies. “Everything from Kalamazoo.com to Burbank.com to Sausalito.com to GreatFalls.com; each City will have its own distinct characteristics and opportunities. We look forward to the challenge to make each City.com property a household name in each community” says Mercaldo.

CitiesPlanet will also handle all of the marketing and advertising responsibilities for Scottsdale.com, Chandler.com, Mesa.com, FountainHills.com, Tempe.com, and ApacheJunction.com, all of which have been launched and are connected within the Arizona market. Mercaldo recruited former Travelocity and RazorGator executive Mark Wilson to head CitiesPlanet. “Mark brings a successful track record of accomplishment to the table, combining both marketing expertise and technology capabilities, which is exactly what this project requires”, says Mercaldo. The remaining City.com’s will begin launching the first week of May, and will continue to roll out through July until all 40 are established and successfully monetized. Mercaldo states, “Our entire staff, led by Becky Kelley, has worked tirelessly this past 5 months to get all of these sites ready to go. We are very pleased to be able to finally announce these partnerships, as it has been on the drawing board for quite some time. We are ready to go!”

For more information on GeoDomain Development Ventures, LLC, contact:

Fred Mercaldo, 602-859-3786, fred@scottsdale.com

For more information on Scottsdale.com, LLC and “City In The Box” software, contact:

Becky Kelley, 480-343-3654, Becky@scottsdale.com

For more information on CitiesPlanet, contact:

Mark Wilson, 602-363-3345, Mark@CitiesPlanet.com

State Ventures LLC owns and develops many geographic domain names and web properties, including Maryland.com, OceanCity.com, Annapolis.com, Pennsylvania.com, Virginia.com, NorthCarolina.com, Missouri.com, and Minnesota.com.
Related posts:
1. Palermo.com Launched Using Scottsdale.com’s City in a Box Platform Several months ago, I blogged about Fred Mercaldo and...
2. City in a Box Opportunity I wanted to share an email I received from my...
3. Burbank.com Partnership Announced In July, I blogged about the City in a Box...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

21:18
Private Whois Changes
» ‎ The Official Name.com Blog
Hi folks. Name.com always strives to offer the lowest price on all our products and up until today we’ve been able to offer Private Whois for free for a long time. These types of posts are never fun, and no one enjoys raising prices, but sometimes it becomes necessary so we can continue to offer these great services.

While some registrars charge as much as eight or nine dollars per domain for this service, our new promotional price, starting today, is only $1.99 per domain annually. This means we are still offering some of the best pricing for this service anywhere. We realize that changes like this can impact our customer’s plans and budgets, so we’ve taken some proactive steps that we feel will help to curb the impact of this new change. Those actions are:
- All domains that currently have Private Whois already turned on will continue to receive it for free.
- The new pricing will begin today and will only apply to domains that don’t already have Private Whois enabled and/or new domain registrations.
- We are running a promotional price of just $1.99/domain per year, which is one of the lowest prices available.
- We’ve created a promo code called “FREEWHOIS” that will discount the current special pricing of $1.99 to $0.00, making this service free for the first year for orders using this promo code.
Beyond that, we will continue to offer promotions for discounted domains, so keep an eye on this blog and our Twitter and Facebook pages for promo codes.

We hope our customers understand this was a difficult decision for us to make, but that we’ve tried to soften the impact as much as possible. As always if you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to contact our support department or your account representative.
Bookmark It

Hide Sites $$('div.d994').each( function(e) { e.visualEffect('slide_up',{duration:0.5}) });

20:34
Oasis.com: Another Creative Agency Tries to Grab Generic Domain Name
» ‎ Domain Name Wire
What’s up with online creative agencies?

On the one hand, it’s great to see that creative agencies are starting to “get” the importance of having a good, easy-to-remember domain name. There was Media Rain, a Utah digital creative agency that tried to get the domain name Rain.com. Now we can also add Oasis Technology Partners, Inc to the list. The Boston company tried to snag the domain name Oasis.com through UDRP. It too has failed.

Oasis Technology Partners fell flat on its face, not even convincing the panel that it had rights to the term “Oasis”. The company has filed a trademark application for Oasis claiming a first use in 2001. Since that trademark hasn’t been granted, it needed to show some sort of common law rights. This is usually a very low bar.

Even if the company had shown rights to the term “Oasis”, it would have had a tough time trying to prove that the domain was registered in bad faith and that the owner had no rights or legitimate interests in it. After all, when I saw this case filed I assumed the rock band Oasis was the complainant.

The bottom line to Oasis Technology Partners: if you want this valuable, generic domain name, you’re just going to have to pay for it. Trying to hijack it through arbitration isn’t right.

© DomainNameWire.com 2009.
Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Related posts:
19:39
BargainDomains Switches to Auction Format, Catchy.com Gets Catchy
» ‎ Domain Name Wire
Two domain sales sites get upgrades.

BargainDomains.com, a site from Francois Carrillo of Domaining.com that offers domain names at a significant discount from their appraised value, is switching to an auction format. Previously, domain names were offered at a fixed price for 30 days. Little information about the auctions is available at this time, but submissions are open at the BargainDomains web site.

Another domain sales site from Carrillo — Catchy.com — has also received some significant upgrades. The first is the recent name change from Mocus to Catchy. Now, Catchy.com is obviously a great domain name. (Carrillo tells me he paid a lot for it, and given who the previous owner was I’m not surprised). But it’s even better since, frankly, Mocus.com never appealed to me because it sounds like mucus.

In addition to the name change, Catchy.com now accepts more types of domain names for inclusion. Previously domains had to be 4 letters or fewer; now five are OK. Also, ccTLDs are now accepted on the site. The site also went through a design overhaul and improved its affiliate program.

Most of the domains currently listed on Catchy.com are pronounceable four character CVCV domains such as Cafi.com, Pomi.com, and Pifo.com, although there are also some three character domains.

© DomainNameWire.com 2009.
Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Related posts:
19:27
Barbara Kingsolver Wins Domain Fight, Loser Not Happy
» ‎ Domain Name Wire
Loser in arbitration case makes his case — publicly.

Author Barbara Kingsolver has won a case at National Arbitration Forum for the domain name Kingsolver.com. The soon-to-be-former owner of the domain name is none too pleased.

He has posted a tirade about the case at Kingsolver.com (warning: explicit), which will exist until his registrar has to hand the domain name over to Kingsolver on April 29.

Kingsolver’s agent forgot to renew the domain name and it was later auctioned on NameJet. The buyer sold it to the current owner of the domain, who was then hit with the UDRP.

The owner says he bought it for his computer company, and that he had never heard of Barbara Kingsolver before the complaint:

I have NEVER in my life heard about this person, I swear on my children. I asked many of my friends last week (many of them are from the USA) and they never heard about this person either.

Unfortunately, the owner had yet to change the nameservers on the domain name after purchasing it, so it still resolved to a parked page showing ads related to Kingsolver’s books.

Panelist John J. Upchurch found in Kingsolver’s favor, and ordered the domain transferred.

It would be unusual for a well known person to convince a panel that they have a trademark in their last name. As the owner points out in his tirade, Tom Cruise wouldn’t be able to win Cruise.com and Julia Roberts wouldn’t win Roberts.com. I suspect what happened in this case was that Kingsolver’s prior ownership of the domain played a role in the panelist’s decision. The parked page didn’t help, even though the owner had a legitimate excuse for it.

This isn’t the first time Kingsolver has used UDRP to get a domain name. In 2001 she won an arbitration for BarbaraKingsolver.com.

© DomainNameWire.com 2009.
Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Related posts:

17:33
New 2LDs Considered for .AU
» ‎ DomainNews

AuDA, the policy authority and industry self-regulatory body for the .AU domain space, is currently considering whether to create new second level domains (2LDs) in the .AU domain space.
15:59
Number Resource Organization released its status for Q1 2010
» ‎ DomainNews

A new report issued by the Number Resource Organization (NRO) has found that demand for both IPv4 and IPv6 address space is continuing to grow.
15:58
Moniker and SnapNames To Host “Call-To-Action” Domain Auction
» ‎ DomainNews

Moniker and SnapNames, both Oversee.net companies, will host an online auction from May 4-11, placing some of the best call-to-action .ME domains up for bid.
14:26
My.tel for Android Available Now in the Android Market
» ‎ DomainNews

Telnic Limited, the organization behind the award-winning communications-focused .tel names, announced that its management app for .tel names, My.tel for Android, is now available for free download in the Android Market and direct from apps.telnic.tel.

Permalink for 'Domain_Name_News/2010/04/21/Latonas_Daily_Auction_Net_Sales_Go_Up_As_Reserves_Go_Up'

10:37

Latonas Daily Auction Net Sales Go Up As Reserves Go Up

» ‎ Domain Name News

10:05
Milan T.R.A.F.F.I.C. .EU Auction Inventory released
» ‎ DomainNews

Latona's and T.R.A.F.F.I.C. will host an .EU auction at no reserve on the opening day of the T.R.A.F.F.I.C. Milan show .

10:05
DNSSEC Status Report: Signing Infrastructure Well Underway, User Experience Still Needs Work
» ‎ CircleID

The registries (gTLDS) are all moving towards signing in about a year. PIR and .org is going to be first with .edu, .biz, and others closely behind. The root is scheduled to be signed in the beginning of July (end of June looking at the holiday calendar) being the biggest milestone. Some of the roots already contain DNSSEC information. Other ccTLDs continue to turn DNSSEC on with countries on every continent signed.

Registrars will follow next but they have the toughest part to educate registrants and to do the bulk of the work for key management. Some popular zones in gTLDs will become signed this year and ccTLDs will continue to increase the zones that they sign.

The Validation Infrastructure

Major ISPs, who operate the bulk of the validation infrastructure, have been running trials to test large scale validation. Operating systems continue to improve their support for DNSSEC.

The user experience/application Support

One critically missing piece from the DNSSEC conversation has been the user experience. Even the DNS community is undecided how applications should handle DNSSEC responses. The cases where an answer is valid and signed is clearly defined. What happens for the non-signing DNS response or the one that is signed but is bogus?

Think about HTTPS. When you visit a site that is HTTPS and has a certificate from a certificate authority that your browser trusts, you see a padlock. You can then enter information, knowing that the channel is authenticated (who it is) and encrypted (not plain text). If you do not see a padlock, you shouldn't enter sensitive information. When you have a bad certificate, you see a warning. What's the equivalent for DNSSEC?

DNS validation occurs at a deep layer than most applications (the operating system just handles DNS and the application uses IP addresses) while the "secure" part of HTTP operates at the same layer (not technically true but the decryption is done at the same layer: the application layer). Anyway, there is no good mechanism for the application to tell the user there is an error. If the validation piece says that an answer is bogus, it may look there is no such answer. That's probably better since most users tend to just click through blindly. Different networks will have different policies for validation and this will have to be coordinated with applications (whether the OS or the actual application layer).

When Everything is Signed

What's exciting to me is what happens after there is a globally coherent, distributed, public key database. While I can see DNS records being signed, I am sure that there are others out there who are thinking about putting login keys or other crypto fingerprints into DNS. After the summer of this year, expect the attention to shift towards the validation infrastructure and the application support.
Written by Jeremy Hitchcock, DNS and networking engineer, CEO at Dyn Inc
Follow CircleID on Twitter
More under: DNS, DNSSEC, Domain Registries, Security

10:01
Gifted.com tops Sedo's weekly domain name sales list
» ‎ DomainNews

Gifted.com topped Sedo's weekly sales cheart at $94,000 .The second highest sale of the week is species.com,sold for $37,500 .
10:00
Edwin Hayward’s $1 reserve auction is underway at Latona's
» ‎ DomainNews

Edwin Hayward’s $1 reserve auction started yesterday at Latona's and will run until 6 p.m. today .

7:22
PCI for the Cloud
» ‎ Infrablog

For most enterprise and security vendors, the cloud is fascinating both as a technology and a business disruptor. In fact, SAAS CEOs such as Successfactor, SalesForce and NetSuite are hot shots in Silicon Valley these days. Yet, most of us are still wondering how much IT budget is actually going to be thrown at the so-called private, hybrid and public clouds in 2010. So what is in the way of the big shift?

We had a good discussion on this topic at AlwaysOn today. At least, it seems that everyone agrees on the main challenges: integration is harsh, security is dicey and compliance seems out of reach. So, where do we start? I am starting to believe that there too, we need to provide a baseline for cloud security and trust. Like PCI for e-commerce, a certification for the cloud will not make the cloud completely secure, but it will at least provide a set of common definitions and best-practices for cloud security and trust. It will also make it much easier for enterprise customers to evaluate and rationalize the security of any cloud vendor. In fact, prospective cloud customers will be able to contractually commit cloud vendors to well documented certification levels and build additional SLA and security contractual requirements on top.

So whether you are a security vendor, a cloud provider or an enterprise, there is one more thing that we may be able to agree with: trust certification could drive cloud adoption by simplifying the definition, evaluation and contracts for cloud security, compliance and trust. Of course, it starts with identity, so time to get to work.

6:15
ICANN Board to Review UDRP Provider Relationship on Thursday
» ‎ Domain Name Wire
UDRP on the table at Thursday’s board meeting.

ICANN has posted the agenda for its April 22 meeting, and item 10 reads:

UDRP Policy – relationships with service providers; changes in procedures

What exactly is this about? An ICANN spokesperson told me there’s no additional information available, and what the topic is about won’t be known until the minutes from the meeting are published.

But my guess is this has to do with two things that have created buzz in the community over the past couple months:

1. The fact that there’s no contract between ICANN and UDRP providers.

2. Certain UDRP providers have been playing around with their Supplemental Rules to try to change the overall UDRP process.

For example, Czech Arbitration Court has created a sort of UDRP-lite, where complainants can pay reduced fees for simple cases if the respondent doesn’t submit a reply in the case. Although there may be some merit to such an idea, the supplemental rules certainly weren’t mean for making such a change.

Internet Commerce Association sent a letter to ICANN about the Czech Arbitration Court change over a month ago, and ICANN hasn’t responded.

© DomainNameWire.com 2009.
Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Related posts:

← April 20 (22 items) April 22 (26 items) →

TOP RSS Gregarius 0.5.4 Tentatively valid XHTML1.0, CSS2.0 Last update: Tue Feb 7 14:30:13 2012

boxingticket.com	$1,000
autoinsurancepolicies.com	$2,600
layaways.com	$1,125
autoinsuranceagent.com	$2,625
assaultweapons.com	$3,200
hockeyticket.com	$2,750
hockeyscore.com	PASSED
snowshovels.com	$2,100
skibums.com	PASSED
independentgame.com	PASSED
wemight.com	PASSED
imight.com	$1,000
goldpieces.com	PASSED
equestrianhome.net	PASSED
equestrianhome.com	PASSED
castmembers.com	PASSED
callforsale.com	PASSED
waterproofers.com	PASSED
weddingvideos.net	$1,000
recycledgames.com	PASSED
romantically.com	PASSED
rehearsalrooms.com	PASSED
recycledgame.com	PASSED
lesbianlawyer.com	PASSED
metrosexuals.com	$1,000
usracing.com	PASSED
westernwear.net	$1,000
sunpost.com	PASSED
koreantravel.com	PASSED
customtires.com	PASSED

freedomcycle.com	PASSED
virtualmarketing.com	$1,650
wineguide.net	PASSED
brokerageservices.com	$1,925
bettinggames.com	$1,925
themovers.com	$1,000
mediaconsultant.com	$1,465
athleticshoe.com	PASSED
floridaholiday.com	$2,700
groom.net	$2,600
internetnewspaper.com	$1,000
nerdsrule.com	PASSED
workhard.com	$1,125
thelawoffice.com	$1,555
freetriple.net	PASSED
certifiedcontractor.com	$1,000
weddingoutlet.com	$2,266
baseballticket.com	$5,250
baseballscore.com	PASSED
romanticmovies.com	$1,325
guitarclinic.com	PASSED
propertyvaluations.com	PASSED
steakrestaurants.com	$3,600
keywestmotels.com	PASSED
doodling.com	$2,955
keywestresort.com	PASSED
romanticfilms.com	PASSED
dartgame.com	$1,000
gawkers.com	$2,650
newautos.com	$2,375
fishingseason.com	$3,900
customcycle.com	PASSED
steakrestaurant.com	$1,650
weddingpicture.com	$2,155
maidenname.com	PASSED
dartgames.com	$1,000
circusticket.com	$1,000
fbnc.com	$1,000
basketballscore.com	PASSED
circustickets.com	$1,655
soccerscore.com	$1,925
fremontstreet.com	$1,175
footballscore.com	$1,025
soccerticket.com	$1,175
pathogen.com	$2,401
rvsonline.com	$1,000
stockinvestment.com	$2,901
stockinvestments.com	$3,088
vegasline.com	$2,855
basketballticket.com	$1,175
rosebushes.com	$3,751
hardwater.com	$2,000
huntingseason.com	$3,700
seasonpasses.com	$1,434

baltimore.mx	PASSED
baltimore.com.mx	PASSED
banador.mx	PASSED
banador.com.mx	PASSED
bagdad.mx	PASSED
bagdad.com.mx	PASSED
bald.mx	PASSED
bakersfield.com.mx	PASSED
ayer.mx	PASSED
ayer.com.mx	PASSED
ayudantes.mx	PASSED
ayudantes.com.mx	$60
autoridad.mx	PASSED
autoridad.com.mx	PASSED
avanzar.mx	PASSED
avanzar.com.mx	PASSED
austin.com.mx	$60
austin.mx	$60
austinpowers.com.mx	PASSED
australianopen.com.mx	PASSED
aun.com.mx	PASSED
aun.mx	PASSED
aunque.com.mx	PASSED
aunque.mx	PASSED
atreverse.com.mx	PASSED
attilathehun.com.mx	PASSED
audioslave.com.mx	PASSED
aumentar.com.mx	PASSED
asunto.com.mx	PASSED
asunto.mx	PASSED
atkinsdiet.com.mx	PASSED
atkinsdiet.mx	PASSED
bola.com.mx	PASSED
boisecity.com.mx	PASSED
blondie.com.mx	PASSED
blondes.mx	PASSED
blondes.com.mx	PASSED
blindfaith.com.mx	PASSED
blacksabbath.com.mx	PASSED
blackjackonline.com.mx	PASSED
billete.mx	PASSED
billete.com.mx	PASSED
bilene.mx	PASSED
bilene.com.mx	PASSED
berne.mx	PASSED
berne.com.mx	PASSED
berkeley.com.mx	PASSED
belladonna.mx	PASSED
belgrado.mx	PASSED
belladonna.com.mx	PASSED
beber.mx	PASSED
belgrado.com.mx	PASSED
beatles.mx	PASSED
beber.com.mx	PASSED
beastiboys.com.mx	PASSED
beatles.com.mx	PASSED
bastar.mx	PASSED
beastiality.com.mx	PASSED
bastante.mx	PASSED
bastar.com.mx	PASSED
bargain.mx	PASSED
bastante.com.mx	PASSED
bancarrota.com.mx	PASSED
bancarrota.mx
burbank.mx
burbank.com.mx
butcher.com.mx
bushido.com.mx
buysoma.com.mx
brucespringsteen.com.mx
brownsville.com.mx
buen.com.mx
bucarest.com.mx
buffalospringfield.com.mx
buen.mx.com	$60
buque.mx	PASSED
buque.com.mx	PASSED
borde.mx	PASSED
bordo.com.mx	PASSED
bordo.mx	PASSED
bragas.com.mx	PASSED
bragas.mx	PASSED
brazo.com.mx	PASSED
brazo.mx	PASSED
bridgeport.com.mx	PASSED
bola.mx	PASSED
bolso.com.mx	PASSED
bolso.mx	PASSED
bonjovi.com.mx	PASSED
boobs.com.mx	PASSED
boobs.mx	$60
booty.com.mx	PASSED
borde.com.mx	PASSED
abandonar.com.mx	PASSED
abandonar.mx	PASSED
abastecedores.com.mx	PASSED
abuelo.com.mx	PASSED
abuelo.mx	PASSED
acabado.com.mx	PASSED
acabado.mx	PASSED
abrigo.com.mx	PASSED
abrigo.mx	PASSED
absoluto.com.mx	$90
absoluto.mx	$60
advertir.mx	PASSED
afectar.com.mx	PASSED
adquirir.com.mx	PASSED
advertir.com.mx	PASSED
ademas.com.mx	PASSED
ademas.mx	PASSED
adelaida.com.mx	PASSED
adelaida.mx	PASSED
alabama.mx	PASSED
alcanazar.com.mx	PASSED
airfare.mx	$60
alabama.com.mx	PASSED
agujero.com.mx	PASSED
agujero.mx	PASSED
afectar.mx	PASSED
afirmar.com.mx	PASSED
acercar.mx	PASSED
acercar.com.mx	PASSED
aceptar.mx	PASSED
aceptar.com.mx	PASSED
acaso.mx	PASSED
acaso.com.mx	PASSED
acabar.mx	PASSED
acabar.com.mx	PASSED
acudir.com.mx	PASSED
actors.mx	PASSED
actors.com.mx	PASSED
acto.mx	PASSED
acto.com.mx	PASSED
actividad.mx	PASSED
actividad.com.mx	PASSED
acordar.com.mx	PASSED
amywinehouse.com.mx	PASSED
anaheim.com.mx	PASSED
anaheim.mx	PASSED
anchorage.com.mx	PASSED
anchorage.mx	PASSED
andreathompson.com.mx	PASSED
angelajolie.com.mx	PASSED
animatedgraphics.com.mx	PASSED
annakournikova.com.mx	PASSED
annarbor.com.mx	PASSED
annuity.mx	PASSED
ano.com.mx	$60
ano.mx	$70
anos.com.mx	$60
anos.mx	$60
anterior.com.mx	PASSED
alguno.com.mx	PASSED
alejar.com.mx	PASSED
aliceinchains.com.mx	PASSED
alguno.mx	PASSED
alonzo.com.mx	PASSED
allentown.com.mx	PASSED
alquileres.com.mx	$60
alonzo.mx	PASSED
alyssamilano.com.mx	PASSED
alquileres.mx	$60
amenudo.mx	PASSED
amenudo.com.mx	PASSED
americanroulette.com.mx	PASSED
americanmusicawards.com.mx	PASSED
amplio.com.mx	PASSED
ampland.com.mx	PASSED
applet.com.mx	PASSED
apropiado.com.mx	PASSED
appartments.com.mx	PASSED
appartments.mx	PASSED
aprovechar.mx	PASSED
aquel.com.mx	PASSED
apropiado.mx	PASSED
aprovechar.com.mx	PASSED
aquello.mx	PASSED
arkansas.com.mx	PASSED
aquel.mx	PASSED
aquello.com.mx	PASSED
asegurare.com.mx	PASSED
asegurare.mx	PASSED
arkansas.mx	PASSED
arlington.com.mx	PASSED
antioch.mx	PASSED
antioch.com.mx	PASSED
antes.mx	PASSED
antes.com.mx	PASSED
aparecer.mx	PASSED
aparecer.com.mx	PASSED
aparecen.mx	PASSED
aparecen.com.mx	PASSED
apie.mx	PASSED
apie.com.mx	PASSED
apenas.mx	PASSED
apenas.com.mx	PASSED
apoyar.mx	PASSED
apoyar.com.mx	PASSED
aplicar.mx	PASSED
aplicar.com.mx	PASSED

toykos.com	$376
unitednews.com	$145
taxreturnsonline.com	$280
thebritishopen.com	$91
vitaminwholesaler.com	$135
waterfronthomes.net	$475
upjm.com	$21
vgin.com	$99
squashracquet.com	$875
squashracquets.com	$2,000
softwaresite.com	$555
specialprices.com	$500
stockquotesonline.com	$177
surrounded.com	$620
stockcar.net	$137
stockquotesonline.com	$60
womenscologne.com	$109
windtower.com	$353
weedwhacker.com	$326
fleamarketing.com	$121
spywarehouse.com	$735
tidycar.com	$100
absolutebrands.com	$41
acee.com	$437
advancedcolor.com	$82
aper.com	$1,226
audioproduction.com	$6,400
autoloanquotes.com	$1,603
babybook.ca	$81
bcyb.com	$51
bigrigs.ca	$21
blackfashions.com	$72
blackfashions.net	$42
bowstrings.com	$335
brightpitch.com	$11
businessbicycle.com	$11
meninc.com	$184
lithographer.com	$353
nighttrain.com	$426
mypokertour.com	$764
kansascityonline.com	$67
jackknives.com	$550
knoxvilleonline.com	$71
karateclass.com	$1,600
palmspringsonline.com	$151
pagerservice.com	$41
perfumeonline.com	$2,750
pecan.net	$840
ntusers.com	$1
norestrictions.com	$325
oxygentents.com	$71
onlineinformation.com	$2,400
quickcopies.com	$101
ranchhouse.com	$2,415
restauranteurs.com	$275
romanticize.com	$351
petphotos.ca	$21
picturealbumbs.com	$2,001
pokerfinals.com	$577
pressure.net	$1,444
skatesupply.com	$926
snowboardfilms.com	$225
snowboards.mobi	$21
snowboardtalk.com	$31
rvparksonline.com	$81
sacramentonline.com	$1
sailboatsonline.com	$160
saltlakeonline.com	$51
custommachines.com	$71
customgiftbaskets.ca	11
customcorvettes.com	$135
customcorvette.com	$275
conciergedoc.com	$21
cologneonline.com	$475
collegeweekly.com	$509
businessbicycles.com	$41
franchiseshow.com	$678
etheft.com	$860
esitters.com	$826
eggheadblogs.com	PASSED
eggheadblog.com	$1
drugdeal.com	$326
depressed.ca	$475
dartboard.net	$600
golftournament.ca	$87
greenbicycles.com	$153
gasmileage.ca	$41
golfersmagazine.com	$180
gamblingboat.com	$52
gamblingstock.com	$31
freejapan.com	$414
gaggift.com	$975
homevideos.ca	$61
icebeer.com	$575
halogenheater.com	$376
halogenheaters.com	$351
greensecret.com	$21
greensecrets.com	$51
greeniam.com	$72
greenkeyword.com	$1